Facebook Twitter

The Plan

Who Pays & How Much?

The Benefits Far Outweigh The Costs.

The final analysis and decision concerning specific costs and funding will come when the legislative study is complete in 2017.

Bearing that in mind, the 2014 study for Green Mountain Care, aka “Vermont Single Payer” showed that a combination of a payroll tax (to recapture a portion of the savings reaped by employers) and personal income tax (to capture non-payroll income) would constitute a fair and solid foundation to build an adequate tax package to fund the Dr. Dynasaur 2.0 expansion.

Click here to review current costs vs potential savings under an expanded Dr. Dynasaur program.

We believe that when the legislature study comes back in 2017, it will show a larger savings for Vermonters in their health care costs vs what is required in new taxes. If this is not the case, and should more taxes be required to fund this expansion than the savings earned by Vermonters, this campaign will discontinue our pursuit for reform. Our goal is to help Vermont’s economy, not add an additional burden.

THE COST OF DOING NOTHING

Doing nothing is not an option.

»Click here to see why

2.0 PROMISE

If it doesn’t make sense for Vermonters, we won’t do it.

»LEARN MORE

2.0 SNAPSHOT

The nuts and bolts of Dr. Dynasaur 2.0.

»VIEW THE SNAPSHOT

VIDEO

A detailed look into our campaign to reform health care in Vermont.

»SEE THE VIDEO

TESTIMONIALS, ADVOCATES & SUPPORTERS

See what others are saying about Dr. Dynasaur expansion.

»VIEW TESTIMONIALS

Top